?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

discussion: candidates and their platforms

This is a cut and paste of all the candidates platforms linked from here.

If any candidates wish to have the text of their platforms removed from this entry, please email seperis at livejournal and I'll remove the text and keep the link only.

Discussion Rules

1.) Comments must be balanced; when making a post with negative comments on one candidate, the entry must also contain positives comments on another candidate. Comments will be screened that don't fulfill this criteria. All positive comments on one or more candidates are fine.

This does not mean ten paragraphs of anti-x candidate with a single line of VOTE FOR Y YAY! Seriously. Abide by the spirit as well as the letter.

2.) Discussion is encouraged, but flaming and negative personal attacks won't be tolerated. The poster will be banned without warning and the comment screened or deleted. If you think you've been unfairly banned, email the moderators (seperis or svmadelyn) at our livejournal addresses.

3.) Discussion is limited to the ten candidates here. Any comments that discuss a candidate that is not listed here is not on-topic for this community. For discussion of all candidates, go to lj_election_en; ljvotes, ljunited and votepocalypse are some alternate venues.

Candidate Platforms:



daniidebrabant - Link to Platform Post

Who Am I? Name's daniidebrabant, who's wanted to change her LJ name since, oh, forever. Damn thing keeps sticking. That said, I've been here since Sept 2001, having started my LJ right along with my college experience and I've been here ever since through three and a half moves as well as quite a few other changes. You've probably never heard of me, but that's all right. At least, I think it's all right.

LJ and me? I live on this site. While I keep track of RL friends as much as the next person, I've also MET friends through this service and through these comms on the site. In fact, considering that my first 'roommate' was someone I met through an RP game on LJ, and that person got me out of a living situation I was very unhappy with, I can honestly say that LJ changed my life. Aside from her, I've made other friends through this service, people I've gone to see in person more than once, people I talk to the phone with, people I play and write and make art with: LJ is incredibly important to me and I want to be a positive part of shaping the LJ experience in the time to come, especially as I know that it might be difficult.

Why Do I Want to Do This? Because this site has done so much for me, because the membership of this site is so important to me, and because I hate sitting back and saying 'I don't like this' without doing something about it when I have the chance. Also because I think that I will contribute something valuable to the Advisory Board.

Something Valuable? My day job is working as a Member Services Representative at another social networking site. Suffice to say that that membership is sizeable, though the site itself isn't well known within most of LJ's markets main markets. The point of mentioning that, though, is that I have experience in shaping user experience from the company's point of view. I have sat through many many meetings dealing with monetization, cost issues, advertising vs. user experience discussions, 'what the members REALLY want' discussions; I've observed this process. Not only do I find the whole thing fascinating, but it's part of my job in the long run to translate what is most certainly not Earth Logic into something I can tell members while still providing good customer service. I've helped to be the voice of the membership in meetings before, told them what they're doing wrong so it can be fixed; on the other hand, I've also been the voice of the company to the membership. As a matter of fact, I've actually brought some of the LJ kerfuffles up at work and we discuss them strategically, look at what WE can do better by looking at what they've done.

Like I said above, I am first and foremost a member of THIS site, but I know some of what goes on behind the scenes in a company like LJ. And I think that this will be valuable both to LJ and to the membership. There's no better way to talk to someone than in their own language, and that goes for both sides.

That's nice, but is that it? Nope. I'm logical, practical, hard-working, passionate (especially about LJ), and generally pretty darn friendly. I'm a member of fandom and non-fandom comms, run some fandom and non-fandom comms, role play, write (original and fanfiction), icon, do CG and traditional media art, and keep up with my personal journal pretty regularly. I'm available nearly all of the time through LJ or IM or email, I like to think I'm approachable, and as I'm a people pleaser, born and bred, I will do my very best to be there for comments, questions, or anything else. Also, re: some of the stuff mentioned above, I have a very thick skin and an even temper when it comes to this kind of thing, so I'm not afraid of any of the flack that might come my way from any direction (or any of the terrifying things one might find on the internet!) nor will I lose my cool when things get rough.

You done yammering? Uh, I'm a New York-born, New Jersey-living Capricorn in her mid twenties who loves tea, sushi, knitting, Early modern drama, and a host of other things. I have no pets, but I live with a dog and three cats, as well as their owner.





jmaynard - Link to Platform Post

I'm one of a bunch of folks running for the LiveJournal Advisory Board. I think I'd be a good user representative to LJ because I understand that, first and foremost, this is a community of folks who put their hearts and souls into their journals and the communities that form around them.

The folks who got appointed to the board have suggested that the candidates answer the following questions:

1) What do you think is the value of LJ?

This is going to sound corny as hell, but I'll say it anyway: LJ brings people together. It lets them share their thoughts, and lets others comment and discuss and bond. There are folks I've gotten to know a lot better through LJ. I hope folks have gotten to know me better the same way. Communities with common interests can share those interests. Individual people can find others with the same interests. We come to understand each other a little better.

2) What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?

The biggest change I think needs to happen is that LJ needs to put its users first. This was sadly lacking all through the Six Apart era; I watched people leave because they got tired of Six Apart treating them with contempt. The emphasis has been on advertisers and on avoiding being the center of attention from pressure groups. LJ management needs to understand that if the users all get unhappy and leave, the advertisers will too. The pressure group problem, on the other hand, goes with the territory, and the only appropriate response is to deal with the real problems and ignore the groups otherwise.

3) Why do you want to be the elected representative?

I want to make LJ a place where the users feel that they're the focus. I'm tired of watching my friends give up and depart for other similar sites; this defeats both the inter-journal linking and the larger sense of community. I've been around communities of people for my entire adult life, and understand how they work. I think I can help LJ understand how boneheaded moves like the strikethrough will affect the LJ user community. I'm also experienced enough, and mature enough, to explain things and persuade corporate managers that they should do things the right way.

I've got experience in being a member of, and an advocate for, and even a manager of different communities of different sizes. I understand how they work. I know what people want from them. I know how to make them better, and what makes them dry up and blow away.

4) What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?

The biggest concern that I see is that the community thinks LJ sees them as just hits on a web page and free content providers, not as an active partner in making LJ a great resource for users and owners alike. This has GOT to change. If left unchecked, it's toxic.





legomymalfoy - Link to Platform Post

I have been mentally writing this post for the last week, and I'm sure it's still not going to cover everything I'd like to say.

I want to start by saying that I am running to essentially be an advisor. I am not running to push a personal agenda of mine. I am not running to push fandom's agenda. I am not running to push any agenda. That's not my job, that's not why I am here. That may not be the most politically correct thing to say in this election season, but I wish to remain 100% transparent with you. I would like you to have all of the facts before you make your final decision.

1) What do you think is the value of LJ?

When speaking about value, I feel that the irresistible value of LiveJournal is in its community. We are what makes LJ valuable. The users who post about their day, about their kids, about their last BDSM encounter, about sex and food and everything under the sun. Without its users, LJ is nothing but an empty husk. To continue being valuable, LJ needs to work on retaining existing users by keeping the aspects of the site that are most valuable to them, while at the same time attracting new users by making new features available and taking advantage of new ways of thinking.

2) What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?

Top on my list, is a usable site search that will allow users to search their entries. A search engine that is actually hosted on LJ, and not powered by and linked to a third party site.

I would like for LJ to treat all of its users with respect. Respect that we are smart. Respect that we are not "one size fits all". Understand and accept that site changes aren't going to make everyone happy, but work to a compromise which allows everyone to get as much of what they want as they can.

I would love for LJ to be clear on why decisions are made.

Finally, I would like to see LJ give clearer explanations in terms of policy. List updated policies in an easy to find place, and explain why we take action, and why we do not. A good majority of dissatisfaction with the Abuse Prevention Team (APT) comes from those who feel that we did not take the action they personally desired, whether or not the actions being reported were in violation of the TOS/US law or not. I feel that clearer explanations will a long way in this regard, since people have a right to know the standards to which they are being held

3) Why do you want to be the elected representative?

-I want to be the elected representative because I feel that I truly understand the needs and concerns of the community as a whole. I know what's broken on the site, and I know how to get these issues resolved. I know which policies aggravate them, and I am able to bring these topics up for discussion with other APT members. In turn, I can work with other Advisory Board members, explaining how things work to them.

-I am completely versed on site policy, working to uphold it on a daily basis.

-I am an incredibly patient, free-thinking and reasonable person. At the same time, I can be as stubborn as an ox when it comes to user rights.

-I am an active member of fandom. I know what issues are forefront with them, and would love to work on repairing the bridge between LiveJournal and fandom. It can be done, if we're all willing to work together.

4) What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?

I believe that first on the list for many would be any real or perceived censorship. Clearing up what is OK, and what is not would help put at least some of these fears to rest.

Next would be the issue of Basic Accounts. A compromise needs to be reached that would allow these account types to return in some form, while also allowing the site to grow.

As I mentioned above, I believe that misunderstanding of how the site works leads to a lot of tension and confusion. The community needs to know where the boundaries are, and why they get in trouble for crossing them.

Advertisements continue to be a large issue for many of us on LiveJournal. If they are going to remain on the site, and I am fairly sure that they will, we need to continue to keep them hidden from paying users, and in general ensure that they are treated as the necessary evil that they are rather than something desirable.





lordandrei - Link to Platform Post

Hi.

I'm running for the Advisory Board for LiveJournal.

The reasons I decided I would be a good candidate are:

1) I have been an active user of LiveJournal for over 5 years. I established my primary LiveJournal account in October 2001. In that time I have brought many users into LiveJournal (ah, who remembers invite codes). I have helped develop software clients that work with LiveJournal (iJournal, Xjournal, NewsAccess). I have started several communities, some of which prosper today without my participation (con_central)

2) I have been working researching and developing in the technology area of "Social Networking" for about 20 years. My experience as a net-based user of network based social tools goes back 30 year. (Writing and running BBS software in Basic on an Apple ][ in 1979. Go, go Gadget 300 baud modems!) I work in the software industry as an engineer. I understand how software is put together and what the business end of the software life cycle is. I'm also a user and want to be able to use LiveJournal.

3) I feel I have a balanced view on the topics. I believe strongly in the freedom of speech. At the same time I am the parent of a toddler and am strongly concerned on giving parents working tools necessary to meet their needs for filtering content. I strongly acknowledge that LiveJournal is a business that offers resources to many countries and many legal jurisdictions that may not share the same freedoms. As a result, to keep the service alive, some concessions need to be made that will ultimately be unpleasing to some. Finally, I believe that the end user is the customer. This is the person who will choose to use the service or find an alternative. Being honest, fair, and open with the end user is the most important way to keep them feeling part of the process and not driven to find those alternative services.

4) I am for the most part... sane. My primary journal (for the most part) is open to the public. I filter comments from those who I don't have on my flist. My posts span the range from family updates, technical observations, and the occasional rant, drivel, or (perish the thought) pointless meme.

I don't consider myself the average user. But I strongly consider myself a typical user. And I think that in itself is what we need as a representative on the Advisory Board.





qfemale - Link to Platform Post

It was suggested that I answer the following few questions to help you decided if you want to vote for me. Here we go!

1) What do you think is the value of LJ?

The value of LJ is its user base! Not only do uses provide content which can be the reason for others to sign up but they also create communities and bring people together over one topic.
Also each person is different and because of that uses their journal or a community in a different way. Maybe even in a way that the original programmer of a toll or the whole site hasn't even though of, thus increasing the value. But without the users LJ would just be a fancy site with fancy tools that sit around and collect cyber-dust.

2) What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?

Personally there are three things I'd like to see changed. Removal of the tag-limit, video-embedding of scrapBook videos and the ability to create basic accounts again.
However what I want is not always what the community wants so if we're talking about what would be good for the community that is LJ the following things should be changed:

- Take a look at the differences between the account levels. Over the past 2 years they seem to have become askew. Plus accounts are no longer that different from paid accounts (and so forth) and early adopters clearly need some love too! (No news posts goes by without somebody brining that topic up!)

- Re-prioritize the creation of new tools and services. Right now it seems that LJ goes for the things that are easy and quick to create or cheap to buy instead of what the users would like to have.

- Work on the way LJ is communicating with its users. Past incidences have shown that LJ does not communicate enough or the right thing to its users. There is also a lack of 'between information' - for example we're still waiting for a policy change but nobody is giving out information how that project is going or if people are even working on it. All you're ever told is to watch 'this' and 'that' community.

There are more things I could name that should be changed but I guess the above would be fairly enough for a years work :-)

3) Why do you want to be the elected representative?

In simple word because LJ is my home and all of my online-friends are here and I'd like to see the site staying as great as it is. But over the past 18 months some really sad things have happened and a lot of users got driven away from LJ and I wish I could do something to change that.

4) What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?

I think part of that I've already covered in my response to question #2. But really I think it's the concerning lack of communication or the way LJ communicates to begin with. Users feel ignored or are afraid that LJ might change even more - yet all their problems and needs keep being ignored. (For example users are afraid LJ will turn into MySpace just so somebody can make a bigger amount of money from the site - when the user base does not want LJ to be like MySpace at all and has told LJ so already.)





randomposting - Link to Platform Post

1) What do you think is the value of LJ?

First, and foremost the value of LJ is the community. The diverse and wonderful group of bloggers from all over the world make this site. All of the users are more enriched by their membership. Without each and every one of us there would be a void. We need to continue to make this place welcoming and positive to encourage new users to join, and to keep those of us that are all ready present confident in continuing to live here. We share our most personal thoughts, our art, our accomplishments and our losses on our blogs, and we need to feel safe in doing so. Our content is what keeps this community interwoven.

LJ brings people together; People that might not have had the opportunity to know each other without this outlet. I have made many dear friends whom I love through this site and know many of you have done so as well.

2) What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?

I think the most important change that can be made is for LJ to be more candid and honest with their communication. There have been a lot of underhanded decisions made in the past year, and I think it's important that we have input in some choices that are made. Even if they do not decide to change their policies and procedures I feel it is very important that they communicate any changes to us. It is necessary that LJ and their staff and elected members show respect to the userbase.

Specifically I want to see:

-The free non-ad-based accounts return as an option.
-More control over the ability to remove bots and spammers from your profile when they've added you as a friend. I understand that it can be very uncomfortable having a user who represents something you disagree with listed on your profile, and having them list you. This would not change their ability to see unlocked posts, but it would give many people peace of mind.
- Instill very clear terms of service and not change them at a whim.
- Create two more elected user positions next year. I think that if we have more members of the community represented on the board, it would be a positive change.

3) Why do you want to be the elected representative?

I am a very positive person. I feel that is something that has been missing from livejournal recently, and I know that I can be a positive voice of change. I have a broad and diverse friendslist that helps me focus on issues that concern the userbase of LJ. I have very good communication skills, and most of all, I listen. I listen to those things that concern our community and I will bring your concerns to the board, and your voice will be heard.

I am active in roleplay, so I have a very specific interest in fandom, and freedom of speech for those users who participate in that rich and vibrant aspect of LJ. I am also a Mother, and am fiercely protective of children. I think that locked posts are the way to go for those things that are inappropriate for a child to come across on the site, but I also think that it is a parents duty to supervise their children so that they don't happen upon things that are inappropriate for them. Legally, LJ has to be very careful with what they allow and I understand this, but I think there needs to be more communication and clearer guidelines on all levels of LJ.

4) What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?

I have addresed most of this above, but am happy to reiterate here.
Communication, Respect and Honesty.

If all three of these tenets are observed and followed by LJ staff and owners toward the community, and vice versa I think most of the problems that we have been facing will be vastly improved. Many of us have lost a lot of respect for Livejournal over the past couple of years and I know it will be a trial for some to allow that respect to grow again, but I truly believe that it can and will happen. We are all still here for a reason, and that is because this community is incredible. We have the tools and the power to make this community great once again.

I promise to do all that I can to bring my ideals and passion for LJ to the advisory board. I also promise to answer any and all questions that any of you bring to me. I post daily and will respond to your concerns.





rm - Link to Platform Post

Four questions were suggested to all the candidates for this post, and since this isn't a format I've pursued before, I decided to run with it.

As some of you know, I will actually be in Sicily for the next week (I leave later today), so my access may be sporadic during that time, but what online time I have will be dedicated to this election process, which I believe has the potential to make LJ a better place regardless of the outcome.

What do you think is the value of LJ?

For me personally, LJ has been a way to stay in touch with friends, hone my writing and document my life for myself, and at least intermittently, for the amusement of others. I met my partner here. I found support when I was diagnosed with a rather unpleasant genetic disease. And I have fun talking about the things I'm passionate about from fencing to fandom.

While those LJ experiences are far from uncommon, they don't even begin to speak to the totality of LJ's value both as a platform for personal expression and a tool for community development. LJ gives the user the unique ability to feel both less alone in the world and more singular, whether on issues serious or trivial.

LJ allows users to experience both the world as they wish it to be, through connections with like-minded individuals, and to witness the world as it is through exposure to those of completely different circumstances and views.

What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?

The number one issue has to be better and more respectful communications between LJ and its users. Every other concern (and there are a whole bunch we'll get to in just a second) can only be addressed if this happens. That means LJ has to recognize that users generate the content that brings in even more users that in turn generate the revenue in an ideally constant cycle. LJ's users -- free, plus and paid -- are the building blocks of the revenue model and should be treated accordingly.

What does that mean?

1. It means we need a clear TOS that is uniformly enforced.
2. It means we need communication with users whenever the TOS is updated.
3. It means we need a system for dealing with abuse and other user concerns that is transparent and allows users to present their side of the case -- justice without defense or appeal is not justice.
4. It means we need an LJ administration that recognizes and is comfortable with the diversity of its users and their interests.

Practically, what needs to happen in the next year?

LJ needs to finally resolve the free speech issues that began with Strikeout and Boldthrough. While as a private corporation LJ has the right to decide what type of content it will and won't allow, my argument is for the broadest range of speech permissible under the laws of California (where LJ is incorporated). This level of free speech should be the right of all LJ users, regardless of location or topic. Political speech needs to be protected. Religious speech needs to be protected. Creative speech needs to be protected. If it's legal speech it should be permissible on LJ.

LJ is a platform. Not a parent.

LJ needs to address disability issues. This includes getting the ALT tag working for our visually impaired users and apologizing to users with mental health/illness issues for essentially erasing their existence from the site in the debacle with the top 100 interests list.

LJ needs to honor its original commitments made to the users. These include the ongoing availability of free accounts and the right of every user to experience an ad-free LJ if they so choose.

Why do you want to be the elected representative?

To be frank, I hemmed and hawed about running at the beginning. This job is going to be hard. It's going to be time-consuming and it's going to be thankless.

But the fact remains that I have a set of unique characteristics and credentials that make me believe I am the person who can most make the LJ powers-that-be listen.

Why?

1. I currently have early adopter, paid and free accounts.
2. I am a professional author whose publisher advertises on the site.
3. I have an extensive professional background in public relations and marketing.
4. I have the previous experience of working for an on-line community of which I was also an active part.
5. I already have a good rapport with staff members on several of the current user concerns. At the same time, I have no personal friendships or loyalties to the staff or other powers that be.
6. I am relentless, clear, and systematic when it comes to problem solving.
7. I love LJ with all my heart, but I am not a cheerleader. I will call it like I see it, and can be both diplomatic and aggressive.
8. I am resilient.
9. I am an active and proud part of fandom (HP, Torchwood/Doctor Who, Riverside, His Dark Materials, Kushiel, etc.)

Everything that makes me not cuddly in most circumstances makes me perfect for this job.

What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?

Communication. Respect. The safety to be ourselves. The right to be ourselves. What the TOS really means. Free expression. A high quality user experience. Features that work. Features that matter. Preservation of community. Preservation of LJ's unique culture. Accessibility. Usability.





sollitaire - Link to Platform Post

Nomination for Sollitaire
Reasons why you should vote for me:

1. I've been a part of the LJ community since January 2001 and as a result I've been witness to the several ways LJ has changed over the years from invite codes to the addition of ads and virtual walk-outs. I am also a long time paid member and community maintainer. I understand the community from the inside out. I've seen what works, what doesn't, and I have a clue as to what could make it better.

2. I'm a grad student focusing on cyber anthropology a.k.a the study of culture online. Online communities are one of my main areas of study as well as blogging, and gaming. LJ in effect encompasses all three. What does any of this have to do with being on the advisory board? My intentions will always be focused on ways to encourage and strengthen LJ in such a way that all community members benefit from decisions that are made, are made aware of decisions being contemplated, and have a say in them as to whether or not changes based on things decided by the board are actually working. I'll be your advocate, your voice, and the board's conscience in matters that affect you.

3. I'm an interaction designer. As an interaction designer, longtime user, and anthropologist I am someone who has the ability to understand what makes sense within the LJ design and functionality from a users point of view. Why does that matter? I can help improve the functionality of LJ by suggesting new and improved ways for the site to work. I have a post as far back as 2003 laying out what functionality would be handy in LJ and I am happy to see much of it has been added over the years.

4. Above all, I have a sense of humor. I don't take myself too seriously and I just generally enjoy being a part of this great community and all of the things it has to offer. For me, it will always be about the community first and LJ's parent company second. That might be unwise to admit for some, but I think everyone should know where I stand. The way I see it, if there is no community - then there is no company, not the other way around.





rebelsheart - Link to Platform Post

Welcome to my journal. The first you might notice is that my entries are marked friends-only for the most part. That's a change I made recently, but before I ever decided to run for the LiveJournal Advisory Board. I want to feel comfortable posting about work, my personal life, and my plans, without necessarily opening up to the entire world. I fully believe that people in the limelight deserve to have their personal lives kept personal, but that they have to work to do that. That being said, this is a reasonably open forum for questions about me and my candidacy for the LiveJournal Advisory Board.

Here's some questions I suspect you'll want the answers to:

What's your opinion on strikethrough/boldthrough?
I feel the initial steps were handled poorly, though the overall recovery from that was handled in a reasonable and professional manner.

You're a LiveJournal Support volunteer in the top 50 for overall scores, have been with Support for two years, but do not have SupportHelp or Admin privileges in any category, nor are you a member of the Abuse Prevention Team. Why is that?
That's something I'm working on. I'm very much a generalist. I'm very good at gaining a lot of low-level knowledge in a variety of related topics. I personally don't feel I'm currently qualified to serve in the role of a SupportHelp. Sure, I can probably identify what answers are approvable and handle the easy questions, but SupportHelps are expected to be more than that. I'm not to that level yet. I want to be there before I apply to the APT.

What do you think of $feature? What do you think about making new features opt-in rather than opt-out?
New features are implemented in response to feedback from users, either through [info]feedback or [info]suggestions. They are added because users ask for them. Likewise, things are changed for the same reason. They are made opt-out rather than opt-in because historically speaking people don't know things are there unless they are shown them.

What do you think of Plus accounts?
Everyone wants more for less if they can't get it for free. This is how LiveJournal chose to address that desire.

What do you think about the elimination of the Basic account type?
I don't like it. It was a business decision, and one that was somewhat understandable, but I don't like it. I'd rather see the Basic account have fewer features or perhaps a slight increase in the cost of a Paid account - it hasn't changed since I got one in 2002.

You're a furry, isn't that kind of weird?
As opposed to any other fandom you'll find on LiveJournal?

You didn't post your comments and entries stats in your nomination post, why?
The numbers can be anything at all, they do not reflect my interaction with LiveJournal users in a truly meaningful way. If you really want to know, check my profile.

What do you think is the value of LJ?
LiveJournal has been around longer than MySpace, is home to users with significantly more maturity (overall and on average), and is a community - not a collection of random individual journals all hosted on the same place. It's very rare to go more than two or three entries on someone's friends page without finding the lj-user icon or the LJ community icon somewhere in an entry. People here know each other online and in person and they care for each other. Most people are here because someone they knew recommended LiveJournal to them or invited them back when invited codes were around.

What changes would you like to see LJ make in the next year?
A fix for the ScrapBook/rename bug, improved ScrapBook interface, new styles (not just new themes), re-introduction of a free without ads account level, improved search (interests, in your journal, in another journal), establish a secondary location capable of standing in for the primary location in the event of (earthquake/power failure/etc) - those are top on my list.

Why do you want to be the elected representative?
I enjoying helping people. It's why I do LiveJournal Support. But with that I can only help the people who ask. I can't do anything for the people making whining noises in their own journals that I don't read. I can share my opinions with some staff members currently, but most of the are directly related to support and already have the same opinions I do about certain things. The fact is, support is not LiveJournal's business - its something LiveJournal provides because it is a business. By becoming a member of the LiveJournal Advisory Board I have the opportunity to speak up for more than just the volunteers who already have a team of excellent voices ([info]coffeechica, [info]markf, [info]arie, [info]janinedog, [info]tupshin, [info]marta, [info]chasethestars, and others whose journal names I don't have memorized) speaking on their behalf; my voice would represent the majority of some 15 million LiveJournal accounts.

What do you think are the community's greatest concerns?
In the past year and change, LiveJournal users have woken up to some very abrupt changes that simply have not gone over well. There is no reason for this. The community is concerned that it's going to happen again. LiveJournal has two major strikes against it in most user's minds and a third will quite likely make it impossible to restore their faith. The second strike caused significant issues for other services such as GreatestJournal and InsaneJournal. There is no greater proof in my mind that LiveJournal is a global entity that has to consider the results of its actions not only upon itself and its users, but the extensive online community of which is it a part. Users want honest communication with all the details LiveJournal can spare without having to worry about damage control from rumors and misunderstandings.





vichan - Link to Platform Post

Who I am: vichan member of LJ since 2003; first as homicidal_nny before switching to my current name.

What you can expect from me: I have no ulterior motives in running. My interests lie with LiveJournal alone. I am not previously connected to LiveJournal aside from being a user. I am not connected to the advertisers. I have not rubbed elbows with LJ staff.
I represent the user because I am the user.

Why I am qualified: This is not just the LJ Advisory Board. This is the first incarnation of the LJ Advisory Board. Whoever sits on the board for this first year will not only be setting a precedent for future board members, but helping LJ as a whole understand just what role the advisory board will play.

I have experience in building things from the ground up. I was selected as a first year member of the Summer Institute Young Adult Panel for the Unitarian Universalist Ohio-Meadville District Summer Institute. This panel planned and executed the young adult program at OMDSI. Following my first year of service, I was elected to come back and serve for two additional years. In addition to this, I was hired by my current company two years ago to build a brand new printing department from scratch. I operate and manage that department to this day.

My experience with planning committees and a career in management give me the ability to look at any situation with a level head, and an understanding of when compromise is necessary and when it isn't possible. Given the diverse userbase of LJ, I know that 'perfection' will never be reached, but that steps can be taken to make sure we reach out to each and every user.

The Change that LJ Needs - Communication:
I would be an asset to the LiveJournal Advisory Board because I understand how vital the issue of communication is.

Despite repeated user requests for more transparency from the LJ staff, we have continuously been on the receiving end of substandard communication.

When changes or problems arise, getting answers has been like pulling teeth. Communication from the LJ staff should be early, often, and precise. LJ users are not ordinary customers, they will nitpick everything, and they will report problems to each other. The fact that recent changes have been discovered and reported by users, rather than staff, has only escalated the irritation of the users.

The LJ staff can appease their customers by being honest and upfront. If change is coming or has come, the users should hear this directly from the LJ staff before the changes begin to impact day to day use.

An additional problem is that we do not have a sufficient central location to retrieve important information. Instead, we have had a variety of communities and are continuously redirected to one or another depending on our interests. To name just a few, past and present, news, lj_biz, lj_2008 and lj_policy have all been used to relay important information to the users. These communities have actually been very useful, as they allow users who may be interested in one aspect of LJ but not another to keep track without getting information overload. However, when vital information is scattered between these different communities and posted in one area but not another, we have a problem. The official LiveJournal News page does not include some of these important communities, making them difficult for users to find.

Why I am running: I would love an opportunity to give something back to a community that has given me more than I can say. I am hoping that I will have a chance to take part in LJ's future. Recent changes on LiveJournal have upset the daily routine of the users. I have kept a close eye on these events, and I believe I have given a balanced view of every situation that has come up. For example, I created fandom_counts a little less than a year ago during the original Strikethrough. I did not create it as an act of protest against Strikethrough, but as a reminder of the awesome presence of fandom on LJ. I've stuck to its original purpose, and the community still stands as a reminder of just how much LJ means to fandom, as well as what fandom means to LJ.

In addition to fandom, I've used LJ to keep in touch with family and friends, as well as network with other users who share my interests such as music, recording, and baseball. Since my interests are so diverse, I've come to realize just how unique each and every LJ user is. We are not a few hundred groups of users. We are several thousand individual users. My goal is to help the LiveJournal staff reach out to all of them without leaving anyone out in the cold.

Over the past year and a half, I've seen my friends' list shrink as users leave LJ for 'greener pastures.' I want to prevent this from continuing. LiveJournal is more than just a website or a social network. It is a truly unique community that has been built, nurtured, and cared for by the people who use it. Without us, LiveJournal is just an empty space on the internet.

In Conclusion:
Do you want true user representation on the board? Do you want someone who will make sure all voices, great and small, will be heard? Do you want clear communication? Vote vichan



There you go. Discuss at will.

ETA: Added two other alternate discussion venues.

Comments

furiosity
May. 26th, 2008 05:16 am (UTC)
I don't think we need an Advisory Board member to tell LJ admin how much we deplore censorship in fandom. I think that message has already been sent. If LJ admin did not get in May 2007 and August 2007, an Advisory Board representative is not going to get it through their heads, either. I think we need someone to represent fandom to whom LJ admin actually has a chance in hell of listening.

I don't think they're going to listen to someone whose agenda is 100% pro-fandom. They barely listened to us when we turned out in record numbers, so I question the logic of expecting them to listen to one person speaking for fandom, Advisory Board or not. What I see happening with a previously-unknown-to-admin, 100% pro-fandom candidate, is essentially "that's nice, dear. here, have some paid time to give out to all your little friends, now run along and play like a good girl/boy!" in response to any fandom concerns brought before the board.

Fandom has not made many friends within the LJ administration -- for a damn good reason: they've done nothing to win our friendship; that's just how it seems to me from where I sit. They don't like us. They don't trust us. A lone voice on the advisory board, from someone who'll necessarily be out of their depth because they don't know how things work behind the scenes, is not going to do much more than our collective roaring. In fact, it might accomplish even less.

I support legomymalfoy because I believe that due to her long-term involvement with LJ, she has the greatest chance of actually being taken seriously by TPTB during board sessions. It's just that simple. I think they might actually listen to her because they have lots of reasons to trust her and few to distrust.

And I would like to register my distaste for the argument that someone who signed up to do LJ Support/Abuse before LJ had a Draconian TOS must obviously be an ardent supporter of all LJ policy ever.
kenboy
May. 26th, 2008 04:41 pm (UTC)
I personally haven't made that argument, and wouldn't.

I do make the argument that someone who deleted innocent accounts during strikethrough has no place being our representative to the company that she deleted the accounts for, period. It's too cozy and it's not appropriate.

I further think that LJ already has enough representatives on the board, and giving them back the slot they gave us for a user representative, to fill it with another company representative, is a dumb move on our part.

I'm done with jameth, who was given ample opportunity to tell us something we wanted to hear and who finally got around to reinforcing that we apparently want shiny new features; I'd really hoped his history of tangling with Abuse and posting thing that piss off management would have made him the voice we needed; it isn't.

Clearly, it needs to be rm. I don't buy that already knowing how things work in the (clearly broken) LJ administration is a bonus right now, and I question how well anyone could know how things work, since we're on our third owner at the moment.

"Ready on Day One" is a lousy campaign slogan, both in the real world and here.
furiosity
May. 26th, 2008 04:55 pm (UTC)
If one were to assume that legomymalfoy was running to push LJ's agenda or to represent LJ, I'd completely agree with your comment. As she is not, I don't agree. I know she can be trusted to look after fandom interests (if nothing else, she's got porn here, too; quite a bit of it involving under-18 Harry and Draco -- locked, mind, but locked status doesn't actually stop LJ Abuse from deleting "offending" accounts at this time.

At any rate, support/abuse volunteers are not company representatives. They don't work for SUP; they don't have an interest in the business, so I find it just a little bit disingenuous to claim that someone who volunteers is a "company representative". That's like saying a donator is a company representative. I volunteer with PFLAG and I donate to the SPCA, but never in a million years would I believe I or any other volunteers/donators actually represent either organisation.

There is no functional difference between saying "she deleted our accounts" and "she supports LJ policy" because one directly implies the other. That's aside from the fact that you've got zero basis for claiming that legomymalfoy personally went and deleted fandom journals. You just don't, and you can't -- the AT is under NDA and you can't have that sort of information. You don't have "someone who deleted innocent accounts" you have "someone who didn't quit the team in disgust in protest over the deletions of innocent accounts", and these things are not one and the same.

That said, I would not be unhappy if rm won the vote over legomymalfoy, even though I think that legomymalfoy has a much better chance of making a difference.
kenboy
May. 26th, 2008 05:14 pm (UTC)
You know, who knows? The magical NDA is a very convenient way to keep anyone from Abuse to ever have to explain anything to anyone. It apparently covers everything and lasts eternally.

I've heard that before, that she does < 18 H/D, and that's great. If Warriors for Innocence had named her account on their list, what would have happened? Would she have been able to save it? Was it all just done on a code level, bypassing Abuse entirely? Who knows? We have no idea what the procedures were or are, because there's no transparency whatsoever, and we're all apparently content to keep it that way.

Like I said upthread, here we are a year later and there's still no officially released timeline showing who did what when. Why? Why hasn't the administration given us a full (properly redacted, with email addresses removed, etc) reporting of this? Who's the person who said "Oh, these Warriors for Innocence, they're right, delete this list of accounts they provided us with, and whatever you do, don't look at the accounts first to see if any of them shouldn't be there?" Did anyone reply to that memo and say "no, wait?" If so, who? If not, why not?

Donations are one thing; volunteering is another. Depending on exactly what you do for PFLAG, it might not be at all unreasonable to say you're a representative. Jen isn't just working in support, telling new users where to click to upload userpics; she's in a real position of authority, with real power over who gets to keep using the service and how.

I don't think LJ policy is particularly good; why is voting for someone who supports LJ policy in my best interest?
furiosity
May. 26th, 2008 05:47 pm (UTC)
The magical NDA is a very convenient way to keep anyone from Abuse to ever have to explain anything to anyone.
That's a really unfair thing to say. They're dealing with people's private information, often with credit card accounts and home addresses; if the NDA allows disclosure of some things then it might as well allow disclosure of others, and that would simply be unacceptable from a privacy point of view. For argument's sake, even if the NDA were a mere convenience to give LJ Abuse the right to act with impunity, that still wouldn't furnish the proof that you need to truthfully claim that Jen personally deleted anyone's innocent account.

still no officially released timeline showing who did what when
Because what most probably happened was the Abuse Team received the notification from WFI, investigated, asked admin about what to do, and then got a list of undesirable accounts as a result of admin decision. Whoever was online at the time grabbed the list, plugged it into a console window prefixed with the "bahleet" command, and pushed a button. The Abuse Team carries out directives; their job isn't to sit around discussing what they're supposed to do (that would be the Advisory Board's job). Speaking from personal experience working as a moderator, most abuse reports are legitimate (i.e. violating both letter and spirit of TOS), so it's fairly easy to start working on autopilot in the way that you ban first, ask questions later. The Abuse Team, however, doesn't even have the option to ask questions -- 6A/SUP says jump, they can either ask how high, walk away from the position, or let some other, less invested, team member deal with it. It doesn't mean they like everything they have to do.

with real power over who gets to keep using the service and how
But that's just not true. LJ Abuse applies policy that's handed down to them from LJ admin. They don't write policy; they have little final input into its creation. Claiming the Abuse/Support volunteers have real power is like saying a person's arm has real power over what the prefrontal cortex decides to do. I've talked to enough Abuse folks to understand that if they had had the power to do anything except a) refuse to do what they were told and pass the buck or get fired or b) quit before they were forced to apply unfair policy, they (well, the handful I've talked to, back during Strikethrough) would have. But they didn't -- and don't -- have any such power.

why is voting for someone who supports LJ policy in my best interest?
It isn't, but it's also your (erroneous) assumption that legomymalfoy supports LJ policy. It isn't a fact. If she had at any point said "I love LJ just the way it is, and my mission is to ensure it stays just the same", I wouldn't support her. I'm not supporting her because she's my close personal friend -- she isn't even that; we're on good, friendly terms and we have the same OTP in fandom but that's it. I support her because, as I said above, I trust her to remember fandom interests and I believe her opinion on the Advisory Board will actually have a chance of being heard.

If it weren't for the latter, I'd be throwing my equal support behind all of the fandom candidates, but I figure if we're going to put someone on that board, it might as well be someone who has a chance of being taken seriously. And it's not an aspersion against any of the other fannish candidates -- they all absolutely deserve to be taken seriously if elected, but I'm way too cynical about LJ Admin's attitude towards fandom to believe that admin actually would take them seriously.
kenboy
May. 26th, 2008 07:00 pm (UTC)
They're dealing with people's private information, often with credit card accounts and home addresses.

I'm sorry, but I think that's silly. Various levels of government, some even less competent than LJ management, manage to routinely release paperwork, from police reports on up, with the things the public has no right to know (social security numbers, for instance) blacked out. I'm sure the Abuse procedures could be modified to allow an appropriate amount of information to be released. I'm not asking for anyone's credit card information or for their home addresses. I'm asking who did what, when, and for what reasons.

Because what most probably happened was the Abuse Team received the notification from WFI, investigated, asked admin about what to do, and then got a list of undesirable accounts as a result of admin decision. Whoever was online at the time grabbed the list, plugged it into a console window prefixed with the "bahleet" command, and pushed a button. The Abuse Team carries out directives; their job isn't to sit around discussing what they're supposed to do (that would be the Advisory Board's job).

It's great that you think that's what happened; it might even be dead-on correct. The fact you're able to make a guess doesn't excuse LJ for not actually releasing the true flow of events, though. I'll admit ignorance here, but my belief was that the procedure went like this: User A complains to Abuse about User B. Abuse investigates and tells User B what to do (or deletes User B's account.) I did not believe that Abuse would act without first investigating (after all, User A could be lying), or that Abuse had to ask someone else what to do. If there actually is an additional step in there of asking management what to do, I'd like to know who gets asked (i.e., is it the volunteer in charge of Abuse? Is it the paid 6A/SUP Director of Whatnot? Who, exactly, makes the call, if it's not the Abuse person herself or himself? Was this case handled differently than any other case, because perhaps the number of accounts mentioned was so great? Was it perhaps handled differently because the request, as rumored, didn't come through an Abuse report at all, but instead came indirectly to management through an advertiser? Nobody knows, and LJ isn't saying. The NDA is a pathetic enough excuse, but where's the corporate decision to be open?

But that's just not true. LJ Abuse applies policy that's handed down to them from LJ admin.

But HOW do they apply those policies? With what level of discretion? A cop enforces the speed limit set by the law, but you generally won't get pulled over for doing 56 in a 55. If you are, you might get a ticket for driving one mile an hour over the limit, or you might get a warning. At what point does the Abuse person have the option to say "hey, you need to delete the content in entry x" as opposed to "your account has been permanently deleted because of what you posted in entry x?"

From my end-user-with-no-friends-in-abuse position, the abuse team seems an awful lot like a secret police squad. They do what they do, whether on their own or with direction, and they don't answer questions about it.

It isn't, but it's also your (erroneous) assumption that legomymalfoy supports LJ policy. It isn't a fact.

I am completely versed on site policy, working to uphold it on a daily basis. Yes, I realize that she may, every day, be working to uphold policies she personally disagrees with. I understand that's possible. It'd be nice if she'd detail those instances and explain what she's going to do to get policies changed.
furiosity
May. 26th, 2008 07:54 pm (UTC)
I think you're conflating the issue of the NDA's existence with your (reasonable) wish for more transparency regarding what went down during Strikethrough. As it stands right now, the NDA bars Abuse members from talking about anything to do with the work of the Abuse team. You can view it as a matter of convenience, but it doesn't change the fact that the NDA is there. Radical modification of Abuse procedures for the sake of more transparency would mean first releasing the current team members from the NDA. From a business standpoint, are non-majority demands for clarity reasonable to undertake such a step? You tell me. And one of the points stated in Jen's platform is, ironically, more transparency with respect to what the Abuse Team does and why. And she's actually in a position to approach such a change from experience rather than pure idealism.

was this case handled differently than any other case
This is a good question, and I think the answer is actually yes. I don't remember the exact events of the May Strikethrough very clearly, but I remember being under the impression that through some WFI contrivance, staff was involved in a decision that should have belonged to the Abuse team. I doubt any Abuse team member in their right mind would have ordered the deletion of pornish_pixies -- the comm had a high enough profile for being fannish and not in pursuit of actual nubile young children (which was staff's excuse until the fandom boos got so loud they had no choice but to re-examine their stance on what's child porn and what isn't).

At what point does the Abuse person have the option to say "hey, you need to delete the content in entry x" as opposed to "your account has been permanently deleted because of what you posted in entry x?"
I think according to the current TOS, which was changed in response to the fandom outcry, you get a warning to delete content in entry x before you actually get suspended. I think that at this point, they have to say "delete or else" unless what's in entry x is unquestionably child porn (as opposed to, say, chan art). I'm pretty sure that fannish comm owners and fanartists started getting those warnings after the August fiasco with ponderosa121 and Foo -- I haven't heard any different.

From my end-user-with-no-friends-in-abuse position, the abuse team seems an awful lot like a secret police squad
I don't see them that way at all, and I have no more real insight into the workings of the Abuse team than you do, aside from what Abuse team members say in public. I'm not sure how being friends with someone on the Abuse team comes into the picture at all -- the NDA applies to them no matter who they're talking to. I'm under a strict NDA with the company I work for and I'm no more likely to talk about our microchip design with my mother or best friend than I am with a random stranger off the street. I admit I have often got the sense that Abuse Team members revel a little bit in the secrecy in which their work is shrouded, but I think that's only human. If I were a secret agent woman, I'd probably be a bit tickled to "know sooper sekrit things", too. It doesn't have to have any sinister undertones, necessarily, especially not ones that come at the expense of J. Fandom User. :\

I am completely versed on site policy, working to uphold it on a daily basis.
But also, in the same post: I know which policies aggravate [users] and I am able to bring these topics up for discussion And then: At the same time, I can be as stubborn as an ox when it comes to user rights

Even if, again for argument's sake, she agreed 100% with every point and paragraph in the TOS, she's saying right there in that post that she's willing to go to bat for the users with respect to policy. I can understand wanting to hear "I hate the TOS and I'm going to do everything in my power to change it" but that is not realistic. No representative is going to make LJ reverse to circa 2002. It's just not going to happen, whether it's rm, vichan, legomymalfoy, or, Kinney forbid, jameth.
furiosity
May. 26th, 2008 10:29 pm (UTC)
I was just thinking about this conversation and wanted to say for the record that I respect your point of view and I understand where you're coming from, even though I disagree. My friends always tell me I can get overbearing when I'm arguing a point, and I'm usually blind to it until someone explains to me where and how I could've been more considerate. My friends are ominously silent at the moment, but if you feel I've been too abrupt or came on too strong, I just wanted you to know I mean absolutely no disrespect to you.
kenboy
May. 27th, 2008 04:22 am (UTC)
Oh, gosh, no, not at all, and I hope you don't think so either.

Also, we have like, a million friends in common; I see you everywhere, I know who you are, I know you're a good person (since I otherwise have a whole slew of friends with no taste) -- it's not like I think you're some mean troll or something, we're just disagreeing. It's cool.
furiosity
May. 27th, 2008 04:33 am (UTC)
Thank you -- I'm very relieved!! I haven't felt disrespected or insulted by any of your comments at all, so no worries on that front.
zillah975
May. 27th, 2008 02:14 am (UTC)
If she had at any point said "I love LJ just the way it is, and my mission is to ensure it stays just the same", I wouldn't support her.

To me, her platform doesn't sound all that different from this. Her focus (after getting a site search) seems to be almost exclusively on getting LJ to more clearly communicate policy, and to "be clear on why decisions are made." Not necessarily to affect those decisions. "List updated policies in an easy to find place, and explain why we take action, and why we do not."

Yay? As long as they tell us that they deleted 342 accounts because the accounts included "yaoi" as an interest and LJ believes yaoi is ickybadwrong, that's enough?

She says she knows which policies aggravate users, but she doesn't say what those are. I'd like to know. I'd also like to know that in "[bringing] these topics up for discussion with other APT members" she's also going to be a strong and determined advocate for change. I don't see that in her platform.

And, "I am completely versed on site policy, working to uphold it on a daily basis."

Bzuah? Wait, we want to elect as our representative, to advocate for us on policies that are harmful to us, someone who is currently working to uphold those policies?

I'm just not seeing an advocate here, for fandom or for the wider user base. I'm seeing someone who wants more communication, and a site search. These are worthy goals, but they need to be combined with others that I don't see here, and that I do see in rm's platform.

Finally, you say you believe her voice has a chance of being heard. Why do you believe that rm's doesn't? The implication would seem to me to be that the position on the board really is just a sham, and that the only way to get them to listen to that person is to provide them with someone they already know, who they know has supported them in the past and apparently continues to do so.
furiosity
May. 27th, 2008 03:37 am (UTC)
Her focus (after getting a site search) seems to be almost exclusively on getting LJ to more clearly communicate policy
That might be because of all the repeated calls for transparency and clarity of communications tsince last May's events. Not that many people are calling for LJ to change its ToS back to the Wild West days of brad and his merry band of hackers. Most folks (it seems to me) want to ensure that LJ understands that its userbase has a right to know of changes to the site, not to mention changes to the policy before they're implemented and enforced. The users don't have the right to dictate policy, not when LJ is a privately owned business. We do have a right to clear communication on policy and we have a right to expect LJ to listen to us if we disagree. They should be prepared to listen and consider.

Do you have actual reason to believe that LJ is about to crack down the way they did last year? That we don't want another Strikethrough goes without saying -- we've already said so, often, with the aid of cute animals. Why is Jen supposed to rehash it? Lip service?

She says she knows which policies aggravate users, but she doesn't say what those are. I'd like to know.
You don't know which policies aggravate you as a user? Or are you doubting that a longtime Abuse Team member might actually have an idea of what she's talking about? It seems to me a little like walking up to a maths professor and going "Oh yeah? Let's see you solve this quadratic equation, Mr Smarty Pants!"

Also, what policies of LJ are directly harmful to fandom? 'Cause if you're talking about the chan content policies, I don't think any candidate's going to be changing those, sorry. I just don't believe LJ will ever budge on the subject -- if I were into chan, I'd be on IJ. If you really think rm is going to be the magic pill that's going to make LJ see the error of its ways with regards to that policy, I have to ask you what she's got that the rest of fandom didn't when we caterwauled, refusing to be placated, for days on end. And now I'm supposed to believe in my heart that a sole voice on the Advisory Board is going to do what the rest of us couldn't? Sorry.

I didn't mean to say that rm's (or any other fandom candidate's) voice doesn't have a chance of being heard at all. I believe that legomymalfoy's voice has a greater chance of being heard by LJ. For the same reason why most people have a higher chance of listening to a friend's advice than they are to a complete stranger's. For the same reason people are more likely to listen to appeals from a friend rather than an antagonist. LJ admin has no real ($$$) reason to respect us as a group -- we're not their only bread and butter. In the situation we're facing, I perceive the chances of a fandom representative being taken seriously by admin are lower than the chances of a fandom representative who isn't just out to push fandom's agenda and with whom admin already has a working relationship.

The implication would seem to me to be that the position on the board really is just a sham
After all the good brad's involvement on the board's done, I can't see how I can believe otherwise. I don't think it's a complete sham, but I don't for a second believe everything staff claims this position is going to "do" for the "users". I was in the habit of believing LJ Staff long ago, but after everything SixApart's done to us, I'm quite free of that habit and I don't take anything staff says at face value. I don't believe that a brave fandom soldier is going to save LJ from itself; I don't think that soldier will get a chance... unless LJ admin has a right-out-of-the-gate reason to trust that person and consider her opinion. legomymalfoy is, at present, the only fandom candidate who can say that about herself -- thanks to her longterm involvement with LJ and, ironically, to her willingness to uphold policy, no matter how dumb she might privately think the policy may be. It's very "old boys", obviously, and I wish it weren't so, but: LJ is a business now, and it's never going to be the haven it was before SixApart came along, Advisory Board or no Advisory Board.
zillah975
May. 27th, 2008 12:08 pm (UTC)
I'm not saying that she shouldn't be calling for clarity, I'm saying I want someone in that position who wants more than just clarity and will work for it. Whether or not I believe there's another crackdown imminent is irrelevant. I want someone who'll be an advocate for us if one does approach, regardless of whether it's approaching now.

Or are you doubting that a longtime Abuse Team member might actually have an idea of what she's talking about?

I'm sure she does know what she's talking about I want to know what she thinks aggravates us so that I can know whether those are the policies that aggravate me and my friends in fandom. Policies that aggravate the entire user base are certainly policies on which she would need to advocate for change, but I want to know that the policies that aggravate me are in there too.
seperis
May. 26th, 2008 06:38 pm (UTC)
I do make the argument that someone who deleted innocent accounts during strikethrough has no place being our representative to the company that she deleted the accounts for, period. It's too cozy and it's not appropriate.

You really got me thinking about this one. I honestly hadn't considered the conflict of interest angle; or actually, her hands being tied against her will on certain issues due to her conflicting allegiances. I don't think that it *would* come up, to be honest, but it could.

I don't buy that already knowing how things work in the (clearly broken) LJ administration is a bonus right now, and I question how well anyone could know how things work, since we're on our third owner at the moment.

*bites lip* We sound like pets at an animal shelter.
zillah975
May. 27th, 2008 02:01 am (UTC)
If only some nice family would adopt us.

Profile

vote fan 08
fandom_votes
fandom_votes

Latest Month

May 2008
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Terri McAllister